Products related to Disagreement:
-
Disagreement : Politics and Philosophy
“Is there any such thing as political philosophy?” So begins this provocative book by one of the foremost figures in Continental thought.Here, Jacques Rancière brings a new and highly useful set of terms to the vexed debate about political effectiveness and “the end of politics.”What precisely is at stake in the relationship between “philosophy” and the adjective “political”?In Disagreement, Rancière explores the apparent contradiction between these terms and reveals the uneasy meaning of their union in the phrase “political philosophy”—a juncture related to age-old attempts in philosophy to answer Plato’s devaluing of politics as a “democratic egalitarian” process. According to Rancière, the phrase also expresses the paradox of politics itself: the absence of a proper foundation.Politics, he argues, begins when the “demos” (the “excessive” or unrepresented part of society) seeks to disrupt the order of domination and distribution of goods “naturalized” by police and legal institutions.In addition, the notion of “equality” operates as a game of contestation that constantly substitutes litigation for political action and community.This game, Rancière maintains, operates by a primary logic of “misunderstanding.” In turn, political philosophy has always tried to substitute the “politics of truth” for the politics of appearances. Disagreement investigates the various transformations of this regime of “truth” and their effects on practical politics.Rancière then distinguishes what we mean by “democracy” from the practices of a consensual system in order to unravel the ramifications of the fashionable phrase “the end of politics.” His conclusions will be of interest to readers concerned with political questions from the broadest to the most specific and local.
Price: 25.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement.Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals.However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups.Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups.The chapters in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements.They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues.The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology; disagreement; and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics.
Price: 39.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment
The striking extent of religious disagreement suggests that religious conviction is very often the result of processes that do not reliably produce true beliefs.For this reason, many have argued that the only rational response to religious disagreement is to adopt a religious skepticism that eschews confident religious belief.Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment contests this skeptical conclusion, explaining how it could be rational to maintain confident belief even in the face of the epistemic worries posed by disagreement.John Pittard argues against the commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality that underlies the case for disagreement-motivated religious skepticism, while also critiquing approaches to disagreement that allow for the unproblematic privileging of one's first-person perspective.He emphasizes the importance of having rational insight into reasons that favor one's outlook; however, he challenges narrowly intellectualist accounts of insight, arguing that many of the rational insights crucial to assessing religious outlooks are not achievable through analytical reasoning, but only through relevant emotional experiences. In the second part of the book, Pittard considers the implications that accepting the impartiality requirement favored by "disagreement skeptics" has for religious commitment.He challenges the common assumption that a commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality would rule out confident religious belief.He further argues, however, that such an impartiality commitment would likely make it irrational to pursue one's favored form of religious life and might prevent one from rationally engaging in any religious or irreligious way of life whatsoever.This troubling conclusion gives reason to hope that the arguments against impartiality are correct and that one can justify conviction despite widespread disagreement.
Price: 19.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Upcycling and Recycling
It doesn't take a superhero to save the world, it takes everyone doing their bit.Join the Small Steps Revolution and make a real change.Our revolutionaries are waiting to share the small steps you can do to be part of the solution.VIVA LA SMALL STEPS REVOLUTION!
Price: 13.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What are typical topics of disagreement?
Typical topics of disagreement can vary widely depending on the individuals involved, but common areas of contention include politics, religion, money, parenting styles, and lifestyle choices. These topics often involve deeply held beliefs and values, making them more likely to lead to disagreements. Communication, respect, and compromise are key in navigating these disagreements and finding common ground.
-
Because of a disagreement about grammar.
Because of a disagreement about grammar, the two authors were unable to come to a consensus on how to structure their collaborative writing project. One author insisted on following a strict set of grammar rules, while the other preferred a more flexible and creative approach. As a result, they were unable to move forward with their project and had to part ways. This highlights the importance of clear communication and compromise when working with others on writing projects.
-
What is the disagreement with my psychotherapist?
It's important to have an open and honest conversation with your psychotherapist about the disagreement. It could be related to the treatment approach, goals, or the therapeutic relationship itself. It's important to communicate your concerns and listen to your therapist's perspective as well. If the disagreement persists, it may be helpful to seek a second opinion or consider finding a new therapist who is a better fit for your needs.
-
Why is there disagreement about energy consumption?
There is disagreement about energy consumption because it is a complex and multifaceted issue that involves various stakeholders with different perspectives and interests. Different industries, governments, and environmental groups may have conflicting priorities when it comes to energy consumption, leading to disagreements about the best approaches and policies. Additionally, there are differing opinions on the impact of energy consumption on the environment, economy, and society, further contributing to the disagreement. Finally, the rapid advancements in technology and the evolving global energy landscape also contribute to the ongoing debate about energy consumption.
Similar search terms for Disagreement:
-
Mere Civility : Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration
A New Statesman Best Book of the YearA Church Times Book of the YearWe are facing a crisis of civility, a war of words polluting our public sphere.In liberal democracies committed to tolerating active, often heated disagreement, the loss of this virtue appears critical.Most modern appeals to civility follow arguments by Hobbes or Locke by proposing to suppress disagreement or exclude views we deem “uncivil” for the sake of social harmony.By comparison, mere civility—a grudging conformity to norms of respectful behavior—as defended by Rhode Island’s founder, Roger Williams, might seem minimal and unappealing.Yet Teresa Bejan argues that Williams’s outlook offers a promising path forward in confronting our own crisis, one that challenges our fundamental assumptions about what a tolerant—and civil—society should look like. “Penetrating and sophisticated.”—James Ryerson, New York Times Book Review“Would that more of us might learn to look into the past with such gravity and humility.We might end up with a more (or mere) civil society, yet.”—Los Angeles Review of Books“A deeply admirable book: original, persuasive, witty, and eloquent.”—Jacob T.Levy, Review of Politics“A terrific book—learned, vigorous, and challenging.”—Alison McQueen, Stanford University
Price: 21.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Why Are We Yelling? : The Art of Productive Disagreement
'This is a life-changing book. Read it three times and then give a copy to anyone you care about.It will make things better' – Seth Godin, author of This is Marketing'All you need is Buster Benson.His methods are instantly actionable, [and] his writing is funny and relatable' – Adam Grant, author of OriginalsWhy Are We Yelling is Buster Benson's essential guide to having more honest and constructive arguments. The way we argue is broken. Whether it’s about Brexit, the existence of ghosts, the best burger in the city or who’s allowed to sit in your favourite chair, we end up digging our heels in and yelling at one another or choosing to avoid heated topics entirely.There has to be a better way. Buster Benson, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur with two decades of experience facilitating hard conversations at some of the biggest tech companies in the world, recommends eight things to try in order to make disagreements more productive.By applying these eight new habits, we can flip frustrating, unproductive disagreements into ones that bear fruit and bring people closer together. In this book you'll master practical skills to make your disagreements more productive by:- Understanding four ways of disagreeing that are more valuable than simply ‘winning’ the argument- Identifying the kind of argument you’re having so you know how best to negotiate it- Articulating the best possible version of your opponent’s argument before attacking itWith this toolkit we can explore more possibilities and perspectives in the world, simply because we’ll no longer be afraid to wade into scary topics of conversation.
Price: 18.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Why Are We Yelling?: The Art of Productive Disagreement
Why Are We Yelling?: The Art of Productive Disagreement
Price: 18.04 € | Shipping*: 0.00 € -
Disagreeing Agreeably : Issue Debates with a Primer on Political Disagreement
This book facilitates civil discussion of controversial political issues.Unique to this book is a section that explains how to discuss politics without feeling angry or hostile toward people who hold different beliefs.In addition, the book provides concise and accessible debates of contemporary policy issues including gun control, immigration, the Electoral College, voting, and affirmative action.For each topic, readers are shown that opposing arguments are based on values and concerns that are widely shared by most people regardless of their political leanings.Perfect for students, professors, and citizens alike, this book promotes civility without shying away from controversy.
Price: 37.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Can one distinguish recycling from downcycling and upcycling?
Yes, one can distinguish recycling from downcycling and upcycling. Recycling involves processing used materials into new products of the same or similar quality, while downcycling involves converting materials into products of lower quality. Upcycling, on the other hand, involves creating new products of higher quality or value from used materials. Each of these processes has different environmental and economic impacts, with upcycling generally being the most sustainable option.
-
Can one distinguish between recycling, downcycling, and upcycling?
Yes, one can distinguish between recycling, downcycling, and upcycling. Recycling involves breaking down materials to create new products of equal or lesser quality. Downcycling refers to the process of turning materials into products of lower quality. Upcycling, on the other hand, involves transforming waste materials into products of higher value or quality. Each process plays a different role in the circular economy and sustainability efforts.
-
Does waste reduction go beyond waste recycling?
Yes, waste reduction goes beyond waste recycling. While recycling is an important part of waste management, waste reduction focuses on minimizing the amount of waste produced in the first place. This can be achieved through practices such as reducing packaging, reusing items, and implementing more sustainable production processes. By focusing on waste reduction, we can decrease the overall environmental impact of waste and move towards a more circular and sustainable economy.
-
What are the topics of disagreement in your relationship?
In our relationship, the main topics of disagreement are usually related to communication styles, financial decisions, and division of household responsibilities. We sometimes have differing opinions on how to effectively communicate with each other, which can lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, we may have different priorities when it comes to managing finances and budgeting. Lastly, we occasionally struggle to find a balance in sharing household chores and responsibilities, which can cause tension at times.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.